At 12:11 PM on Saturday, March 7, President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social that Iran had “apologized and surrendered” to its neighbours, that it was being “beat to HELL,” and that it was now “THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST.”
He promised Iran would be hit “very hard” that same day and warned that new, unnamed targets were “under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death.”
That post has 47,800 likes. By the time most of the world woke up on Sunday March 8, Israeli jets had set Tehran’s oil infrastructure on fire, CNN reporters described blackened rainwater falling on the Iranian capital, and a classified assessment by the US National Intelligence Council, reported by the Washington Post, had concluded that the war Trump is presiding over is “unlikely to topple” the Iranian government.
Trump posted on Truth Social and said;
“Iran, which is being beat to HELL, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors, and promised that it will not shoot at them anymore. This promise was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack. They were looking to take over and rule the Middle East. It is the first time that Iran has ever lost, in thousands of years, to surrounding Middle Eastern Countries. They have said, ‘Thank you President Trump.’ I have said, ‘You’re welcome!’ Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East,’ they are, instead, ‘THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,’ and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse! Today Iran will be hit very hard! Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time.”
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian delivered a prerecorded address on state television Saturday morning. He apologised for Iranian strikes on neighbouring countries, saying they resulted from “miscommunication in the ranks,” and pledged those countries would no longer be targeted unless attacked from their territory. He also directly rejected Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender, saying Washington could “take that dream to their grave.”
Aso Read: Ayatollah Khamenei Reported Dead in Joint U.S.-Israeli Strike
I should apologize to the neighboring countries that were attacked by Iran, on my own behalf. From now on, they should not attack neighboring countries or fire missiles at them, unless we are attacked by those countries.
Masoud Pezeshkian, Iranian President, Iranian state television, March 7, 2026. Verified via Associated Press.
More Buzz
There’s a telling divergence emerging between Israeli military commanders and Israel’s political leadership. The generals, who have studied Iranian resilience closely, are reportedly more cautious about expectations than the politicians currently driving the war’s stated objectives.
Iran’s civilian population is bearing the weight of decisions made by its government, by Israel’s government, and by the United States. That is a fact, not a political statement. The conditions generating civilian suffering power disruptions, fuel shortages, restricted medical supply chains are the direct result of the strike campaign being conducted by U.S. and Israeli forces. Naming that is not partisanship. It’s accuracy.
Iranian state media has reported civilian casualties in the hundreds. Independent human rights monitors, including UN OCHA field reports, describe significant displacement in areas near struck facilities. The exact toll is not verifiable from outside the country. What can be said with confidence is that the figure is not zero, and that it is rising.
Trump has told allies, according to senior diplomatic sources cited by Reuters and The Wall Street Journal, that he wants this resolved quickly. The problem is that “quickly” now appears to require either a level of escalation including potential ground action, or strikes on leadership targets that carries profound risk of regional blowback, or a negotiated compromise that gives Iran something in return for halting enrichment.
Iran has not asked for terms. It has, through back-channel intermediaries in Oman and Qatar, indicated it remains willing to talk but not from a position of total defeat. That distinction matters. A regime that negotiates under duress and survives will not honour those terms indefinitely. A regime that is seen by its own population to have withstood American and Israeli air power may, paradoxically, emerge from this with more domestic legitimacy than it entered it with.
Israel says the strikes have set Iran’s nuclear programme back by years and eliminated key figures in the Revolutionary Guard’s command structure. Independent analysts at the Arms Control Association assess the setback as significant but not fatal to Iran’s nuclear capability particularly if intact enrichment capacity remains underground. Where the two assessments diverge, the physical evidence on the ground is not accessible to independent verification.
Iran says it has suffered losses but that its nuclear programme remains sovereign and operational. It has shown state media footage of undamaged centrifuges. Independent experts cannot confirm these images are current or representative. They should be treated as unverified.
The air war has demonstrated U.S. and Israeli military dominance in the skies over Tehran. It has not demonstrated that dominance translates into the political outcome either government wants. Those are two different things. The gap between them is where the next phase of this crisis will be decided.
No credible military analyst in Washington, London, or Tel Aviv is currently predicting a rapid Iranian surrender. The question has shifted from whether Iran can be coerced to how much coercion Trump is willing to sustain before a compromise becomes the least-bad option. If he moves toward a deal, he will face fury from Israel and from the hawkish wing of his own coalition. If he escalates, he risks a wider regional war that draws in Hezbollah, potentially destabilises Iraq, and stretches American military logistics in ways the Pentagon has privately flagged as concerning.